| SEMINARS | ARTICLES | DISCUSSION LEADERS | TAILORED PROGRAMS | ABOUT API | HOME |
|
Have You Moved?
Join our mailing list!
Coming to API
Discussion Leaders
Seminar Schedule
Find Seminars
Early-bird Deadlines Register soon for early-bird savings: |
Leadership / Management CEO Summit on Saving an Industry in Crisis
By API Staff November 14, 2008 02:50 PM The daily newspaper industry stands at a precipice. Rocked by declining print circulation and advertising, disruptive Internet technologies and competition from a variety of new players and industries, the traditional bedrock of American journalism faces a classic change-or-die scenario. Whole swaths of the American populace have abandoned newspapers or are growing up without the habit of reading them. And while the Web sites of news organizations are attracting more readers than ever, the online advertising business is nowhere close to making up for the steep slide in print. None of this is news, yet the industry's response to date continues to be fitful, ranging from simple cost-cutting in some companies to paralysis and denial in others, to commitment to change and innovation in still others. To help newspaper companies find strategies and ideas for re-invention, 50 top executives gathered at the American Press Institute for a day-long summit guided by two corporate turnaround experts. At times akin to group therapy and at other times resembling a business-school class, the summit took shape in three general segments: Specific financial forensics for determining the depth of trouble a company might be in; a discussion of management tactics for leading a company on new paths; and participants trading frustrations, ideas, best practices and suggestions for collaboration. How precarious is each company's position?
Shein, who researched the basic financials of the public companies represented at the summit, concluded that as a whole the industry is at or approaching full-blown crisis stage, though individual companies are in various phases on the continuum. And he is pessimistic about their ability to halt their fall without outside help. "The biggest hurdles to progress the industry's senior leadership, including some of the people in this room." Shein told the group. "I am not sure you can take a look at your industry with fresh eyes." Shein urged the executives to begin with cold-blooded examination of their financials, including:
But he said that few chief financial officers know how to do this exercise properly. Proper identification of a company's stage on the crisis curve helps indicate how much time a company has to act, and how drastic its steps will need to be. Worksheets were given to the executives to determine for their companies an index known as Altman's Z score, designed by to help identify how close a company might be to bankruptcy. According to Shein, all but one of the public companies represented at the summit are below the safe range. (Bloomberg makes available Z-scores for all publicly traded companies.) Shein and Steve Miller, a turnaround specialist who currently is executive chairman of auto-parts maker Delphi Corp., stressed that moving quickly is critical. But they said simply cost-cutting is not likely to be the right response. "Cutting staffs will reduce costs, but it won't happen fast enough, and will erode the product," Miller said in a luncheon speech. "You have to reinvent your business model." How does one lead a turnaround? Miller, who worked with Lee Iacocca at Chrysler Corp. when it received and ultimately paid back federal loan guarantees, said executives need to be decisive and that success often takes an outsider to come in and shake things up. He and Shein urged executives to spend the majority of their time on strategic initiatives for re-invention, rather than on current operations. Among specific leadership recommendations:
An Array of Views Participants, who represented small and large organizations throughout the country, readily acknowledged their predicament, yet differed on emphasis. Many focused on the problem of advertising online yielding far less than in print: "We don't have a crisis of audience," said one, noting the growth of online readership. "We have a crisis of revenue" in monetizing that traffic. "We need to be at the intersection of buyer and seller in our communities," said another, although not offering specific strategies to achieve this. One participant expressed the lone view that the crisis was cyclical, not structural, and that hefty cost-cutting is all that is required to tide companies over until there is recovery. Fewer attendees spoke to changes on the content side, though there were a few calls for radical rethinking of newsrooms. One suggested hiring experts, such as a scientist or a bank regulator, in place of some reporters, to highlight expertise. "It's no longer the broadcast model," said another. "We have to have a conversation with the audience ... We need reporters who are willing to act as moderators" of that discussion. One participant demonstrated that kind of change throughout the meeting, live--blogging the event for outsiders, who could participate on the blog via Twitter. And it fell to one of the oldest participants to strike the most optimistic note: "The Internet is the best thing that's ever happened to us," he said. "We have immediacy, and we have unlimited space. The problem is that we have been very slow to react to this technology. But it's an opportunity." Next Steps Participants agreed to reconvene in six months, and to explore additional collaboration. Some spoke of joint investment in research and development of both technologies and products, others of more formal means of sharing information. "Why can't we be the disruptors?" asked one. "We have nothing to lose."
Email this article
|
||