NewsFuture, published by The Media Center focuses on critical issues and trends in online and multi-platform publishing.
Roundtable offers collections of insights and ideas from the American Press Institute.
Be the first to know about the newest seminars and training opportunities from API.
Receive the CyberJournalist Report, a monthly newsletter packed with tips, headlines and great work.
The newsletter features search tips, new resources and other news and notes of interest to the journalism, research, academic and online communities.
Newspaper Next The Learning Newsroom API Home Page
Have You Moved?

Send us an update!

Join our mailing list!
Email:

Coming to API
Discussion Leaders
Mary Peskin
Associate Director, American Press Institute

Appearing at:
Vet the Vendors
04/30/2010 - 05/01/2010
Value Optimized Pricing
08/02/2010 - 08/03/2010
Digital Delivery
11/08/2010 - 11/09/2010
Seminar Schedule
Find Seminars

Early-bird Deadlines

Register soon for early-bird savings:

Car talk: Hour may be getting late for the vanity PL8

Print this article Discuss
By Gene Policinski
January 14, 2008 5:32 PM

E-mail to a friend Print this article


You may never have thought of the center part of your car's bumper as an opportunity for multi-tasking or creativity - or as a free-speech battleground - but it is.

For millions of Americans, that's exactly what those enigmatic messages on license plates are. So-called "vanity" and "specialty" plates let us express ourselves or show support for a cause or organization.

EYELUVU or a plate that asks us to "Support Schools" would seem harmless enough, just another way that car-obsessed citizens can customize their ride - communicating even as they commute.

But sometimes people's creativity goes beyond what state officials will approve: A cruder-but-abbreviated variation of "stuff happens" won't pass muster. And in some states the bans cover references to deities, social causes - and, according to author Stefan Lonce, even the sentiment GETOSAMA, a vanity plate that New York officials want to revoke.

Most recently, the South Dakota Department of Revenue and Regulation proposed legislation to repeal all references to vanity plates. Director Debra Hillmer said the difficulty of tracking and examining all plate proposals wasn't balanced by the small fees received, particularly because people are becoming so creatively "vulgar."

From a First Amendment point of view, the issue of personalized plates seems a Dickensian moment: The best and worst of times.

Best in that for a minimal-to-manageable cost, we automobile owners get to express ourselves to fellow citizens in a kind of mobile public square - showing support for our school, our team, our cause or delivering some personal statement.

Worst in that government officials get to decide, often using an arcane and onerous set of rules, what is "proper" even when political speech - generally the most-protected form of personal expression - is involved, and who gets to speak.

You might be tempted to ask "what's left?" given the list of subjects Alabama won't permit: Out-of-state colleges and universities; private businesses, business organizations or commercial entities of any type; K-12 public and private schools; junior colleges and technical schools; groups within high schools, junior colleges, universities and technical schools, such as band or athletic boosters; unions, political organizations, religious organizations, groups that promote racial or social disharmony; or public officials.

State laws ban words or combinations that would denigrate racial or religious groups, promote illegal activity or are profane. Occasionally officials get creative themselves. In Massachusetts, lawmakers block slogans that are legible via a rear-view mirror, as well as any "code which only a small segment of the community may be able to decipher."

Of more constitutional concern is when words on plates get caught up in political tiffs - most often, when legislatures choose to permit "Choose Life" or similar anti-abortion messages while ignoring or rejecting a similar pro-choice plate option. Officials argue that such a one-sided approach is permissible as "government speech," and that the alternative would be to require opposition license plates for such hallmark sentiments as "America the Beautiful."

Common sense would say fair play for all. But the difficulty of translating common sense onto a small metal tag - for example, puzzling out whether a message is a "code" that only a tiny group can decipher - may lead states to withdraw completely from the personalized-plate market. They might do so despite the loss of revenue to state coffers and the losses to sponsors such as schools, conservation groups and arts organizations that often get a share of specialty-plate fees.

Such a retreat would take away a unique if abbreviated form of free speech - six to eight letters and numbers - that can inform, entertain, puzzle or make us laugh every day.

And that would B-2BAD.

Gene Policinski is vice president and executive director of the First Amendment Center, 555 Pennsylvania Ave., Washington, D.C., 20001. Web: www.firstamendmentcenter.org. E-mail: gpolicinski@fac.org.



Email this article

Please enter your friend's e-mail address

Please enter your e-mail address

If you would like to include a message, please add it here:

Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)