| SEMINARS | ARTICLES | DISCUSSION LEADERS | TAILORED PROGRAMS | ABOUT API | HOME |
Have You Moved?
Join our mailing list!
Coming to API
Discussion Leaders
Mary Glick
Associate Director, American Press Institute Appearing at: The New Newsroom Seminar 02/02/2009 - 02/04/2009 The New Newsroom Workshop (Ohio) 02/20/2009 - 02/20/2009 The New Newsroom Workshop (California) 03/06/2009 - 03/06/2009 Building Community Workshop (Philadelphia) 04/17/2009 - 04/17/2009 The New Newsroom Workshop (Wisconsin) 03/27/2009 - 03/27/2009 Seminar Schedule
Find Seminars
Early-bird Deadlines Register soon for early-bird savings:» Maximizing Revenue Across All Channels 2/9 - 2/11/2009 |
Trivial war references ruin credibility![]()
Published: Thursday, September 20, 2001
Some 18 hours after finishing a writing/editing workshop for editors at the American Press Institute’s Copy Editing Boot Camp on Sept. 10, I got goose bumps during a follow-up workshop the next day, which was Tuesday, the day of the hijackings and terrorism. I had asked the workshop participants Monday that, if newspapers trivialized war in non-war situations, what would they do when they had to deal with a real war? These trivial references are clichés that cheapen newspapers. They are almost always in bad taste, even the most innocuous ones. Most important, they damage credibility, which is the one thing that newspapers have going for them as they compete with other so-called news media. The example I had used was a reference by a newspaper that had run a large headline over an advance story on the October 2000 World Series between the Mets and the Yankees. The headline? War! I said the paper lost credibility with headlines like that because, one day, it would have to use that same one-word headline over a far more serious story. It didn’t occur to me that I might be proved right only a day later. Some editors will tell you that readers understand the difference between a sports context and a hard-news context — and that war references are harmless (even healthy) hyperbole in sports stories. Those editors are deluding themselves. If you refer to baseball games as wars, you don’t have much hyperbole to call on when you get a real war. I spent some time with the API workshop participants on the subject of how the United States has become de-sensitized because we haven’t had a real war since Vietnam. I was an editor at Newsday and later the Miami Herald during that time. I remember that we were sensitive about references to wars, bombs, aerial attacks, etc., then, and I discussed this at the workshop. In the 1970s, many of us had relatives and friends who were losing their lives in Vietnam, and we had cringed at the thought of referring in newspaper stories to a long pass in a football game as a bomb. But Vietnam has been at a low point in our conscious thinking for more than 25 years, and we haven’t been as sensitive as we once were. Until Sept. 11, 2001. There’s an example that I use in my workshops, although I can’t remember the exact wording of the headlines or which paper did this or when. In fact this example might be apocryphal, although it makes the point. It involves an explosion in Tel Aviv, a result of the constant Israeli/Palestinian fighting. On page A-1, there was this six-column, 72-point headline: Bomb kills 23 in Tel Aviv restaurant On page B-1 (the sports front), there was this six-column, 72-point headline: Bomb kills Packers in final seconds Where was the perspective at that paper? On Sept. 10, most of my API workshop participants discussed that example, but I got the feeling they didn’t think it was the highest item on their priority lists at that time. It moved up the next day. Here are some examples of tasteless war cliché references that I have clipped from newspapers (or, in a few cases, they’re examples that colleagues have sent to me over the years):
Here are some tasteless lighthearted references to guns and shooting people: These are some offensive comparisons — and other bad taste: And finally:
Kenn Finkel is vice president of M&K Consulting. He has led sessions for the American Press Institute for 25 years — at Reston and other locations, as well as in the on-line world — on a variety of topics. He has also conducted workshops for the Poynter Institute, Knight Ridder Newspapers, Gannett Newspapers, Cox Newspapers, Southern Newspaper Publishers Association, New England Newspaper Association, New York Times Regional Newspaper Group and the Associated Press. ![]()
|