The Reynolds Center has announced its 2008 fall workshop schedule.
Select a workshop and register from the drop-down menu below.
The Reynolds Center has opened registration for select 2008 free online seminars.
Topics include:
*Intermediate Business Journalism
*Covering Private Companies
*Business Journalism Boot Camp
A decade ago, a bulk of the business press was gushing about one industry's unprecedented growth, assuring readers they would develop an insatiable demand for its products.
That was then, when the dazzling glare of the tech bubble blinded us.
This is now, when the housing market promises to do the same. Luckily, many of us see that industry with a more dubious eye, blocking out the glare to see the bigger picture.
Now, we must cover residential real estate with the lessons we learned from irrational exuberance. We must challenge the escalating numbers and look for longer-term consequences. We must include rival viewpoints. And we must search for those neglected by the numbers -- people forced to foreclose on homes they couldn't afford to pay for, or others priced out of the market altogether.
"At this point, we're a lot more skeptical," says Annette Haddad, a business reporter who covers residential real estate for the Los Angeles Times. "A year ago, 18 months ago, it was different. Everybody knew somebody who made 1,000 percent on a sale of a home. At its nascent stage, stories may have been a lot more positive or bubbly about it."
But remember, this is now. "Anybody with a brain knows this can't continue the way it is," she points out.
In fact, forget the sellers who did make 1,000 percent off their homes. Let's talk to the buyers who nodded yes to those significantly higher prices. What happens to their return on investment when they've already bought that close to the peak price?
A larger consideration for reporters is what sparked the housing boom in the first place -- the Fed's lowering of interest rates, what would otherwise be an arcane piece of business news. That begs the question: Was there really as much demand as we all think, or was it artificially boosted by lower-than-low rates? So then what happens to that demand now, as interest rates begin to rise?
Danielle DiMartino of The Dallas Morning News has just a couple more questions:
"Will they be able to sell their homes in five years? It's supply and demand," argues DiMartino, a Morning News market columnist who believes the housing market is inflated. "The American dream will turn into the American nightmare."
Last month, the Realtors trade association happily released news boasting the third-fastest rise in home sales and record-high home prices from February to March.
But don't accept that as the entire story. Think about what's not being said, and the long-term effects of both. For instance, Haddad says, home prices are still rising, yes, but their rate of increase is slipping. So people aren't willing to pony up payments at margins they were before.
"Prices are not going up as fast," she says. "Is this the start of a coming crash? I don't know that. But there's definitely a tempering."
DiMartino adds that home sales are up, and yet, inventory of homes has not slackened. In other words, even as homebuyers are buying at record rates, homebuilders are further stepping up their building.
"The month's supply of inventory is hunky-dory if, and only if, sales continue at their current levels or more," she says. "You're setting yourself up to always having to surpass a new bar."
And many times, market forces decide not to play along with those kinds of plans. If that happens, you best be prepared to cover it.
Watch for lending shifts, consumer debt trends and mortgage fraud. Build spreadsheets of home prices, sales and interest rates over decades to detect patterns. Talk to residents who've paid mortgage for years, and still barely built up equity in their homes. Check financial filings and market charts for homebuilder executives shedding their shares -- a sign they think their profits are about to be squeezed. Search for foreclosures and spiraling home equity loans.
In fact, think of the family finances relying on that equity, from Junior's college bills to future retirement plans. Assuming they're rich in real estate -- for now, not unlike Monopoly money -- many may not have set aside much in the way of savings accounts.
Most importantly, widen your boundaries for sources. Don't just call the home sale cheerleaders. Call their contrarians who worry about the market caving in. Call academics who aren't on either side. And go out and find the best of the lot: real people.
"In the case of real estate, your investor is the guy next door. So I really go out and talk to people. I go to open houses on the weekends," Haddad says. "You have to go where the buyers are."
Like tech talking heads 10 years ago, these sources likely can't foretell the housing market's future. They haven't even settled the debate over whether a housing bubble exists.
Still, this is now, when reporters are at least asking the right questions.
Copyright © 2008 Donald W. Reynolds National Center for Business Journalism
Good article. But it misses one of the key issues that every other article misses - history. I have paid for archival access to the LA Times and read the real estate articles from 1988 to 1994 which was the period during which the housing market last crashed. It reads just like today, except that today downpayments are smaller, there are many more adjustable rate mortgages, and there are more investor/speculators in the market, i.e. it's worse today. The reason people think that real estate can't go down is because reporters drop the ball, and don't tell them that it went down 15 years ago, and 25 years ago, and so on. Teach the public some history, just reprint the articles from 1990, and you'll be doing your job better than any other reporter in the country.
Posted by: Keith H | May 7, 2005 10:41 AM
I have a feeling all these overpriced, shoddily built McMansions going up, that were purchased by people that really can't afford them by use of adjustable rate mortgages during a time of artificially low interest rates, will soon be foreclosures. If they don't fall down first!
Posted by: CS | May 8, 2005 05:27 AM
Everyone knows there is a housing bubble. Even the real estate agents who deny the existance if such a bubble are well aware that a crash is coming. The million dollar question is "When?". Housing bubble stories have been going around for about half a decade now. And there just doesn't seem to be an end to this.
Posted by: Vivek Vedpathak | May 10, 2005 01:11 PM
Very well written article!
My question is this: when/if the bubble bursts, and real estate values in some markets drop 10-30%, there will be lots of people in trouble. Parents won't be able to afford college for their children, "investments" will dry up, and some people will even lose their homes to the bank. And all those people will be clammoring for government assistance. How would the government deal with the equity bust?
Posted by: DB | May 10, 2005 01:29 PM
i have studied economics and real estate
for the past twenty years and i just do not get it any more. The goverment lets out information about the cpi but excludes food and energy. the manufacturing numbers come out and the government says signs are up, and i find out that ecetricity sales are in those figures, so lets see, if the winter was colder and more electricity was used then that must mean that the economy is getting better because manufacturing is up? i just don't get it any more. and the brains on wall street use these numbers. I think the whole economy is a bubble, unless of course all those people with the beautiful cars and suv's paid cash for them.
Posted by: james | May 10, 2005 05:45 PM
I've been in the real estate business for 29 years. I remember the boom of the late 70's and the bust of the early 80's and the boom of the late 80's and the bust of the early 90's. Folks this is the same kind of boom that happened before and the bust is right around the corner.
Posted by: Mary O'Connell | May 10, 2005 09:00 PM
Great article!
I also want to commend Businessweek for a piece this week about how investment in real estate and construction is draining capital from tech and other sectors that rely on innovation.
Reporters are definitely missing a lot of the costs of the boom, not digging deep enough for the funny money and not questioning government statistics on the economy in general.
Very little has been written about the appraisers, who are trying to get laws passed to eliminate agent and lender pressure to inflate property values.
Even if prices in Southern California fall off by 30 percent, that will not bring home ownership back into my reach because prices in my area have doubled and more. Meanwhile my reporter's salary has increased very little (the same is true for my co-workers).
Finally, even if I could afford to continue living here, the construction is so dense and continuous that the area has become much more crowded, noisy, polluted and generally everything people fled to come here. It's just not a pleasant place to live any more.
Posted by: Holly | May 28, 2005 04:23 PM
Well the burst is approaching now and FAST. Politics played the major role in the housing market. Allen Greenspan lowered the rates to help give the economy the artifical boost needed to take the country to war. Well the war is not being won and the forces of the economy are going to bring the income-to-housing ratio to normal which is 1:4
Posted by: Jim | February 8, 2006 06:25 PM