NewsFuture, published by The Media Center focuses on critical issues and trends in online and multi-platform publishing.
Roundtable offers collections of insights and ideas from the American Press Institute.
Be the first to know about the newest seminars and training opportunities from API.
Receive the CyberJournalist Report, a monthly newsletter packed with tips, headlines and great work.
The newsletter features search tips, new resources and other news and notes of interest to the journalism, research, academic and online communities.
Newspaper Next The Learning Newsroom Journalists' Toolbox API Home
Have You Moved?

Send us an update!

Join our mailing list!
Email:

Coming to API
Discussion Leaders
Mary Peskin
Associate Director, American Press Institute, Reston, Virginia

Appearing at:
Visual Journalism Workshop (Texas)
01/16/2009 - 01/16/2009
Visual Journalism Workshop (Florida)
02/06/2009 - 02/06/2009
Visual Journalism Workshop (Kentucky)
02/20/2009 - 02/20/2009
Seminar Schedule
Find Seminars

Early-bird Deadlines

Register soon for early-bird savings:

» Maximizing Revenue Across All Channels

2/9 - 2/11/2009

Action figures and coalition forces

Email storyPrint this article AIM THIS PAGE
By Charles Apple
Graphics Director, The Virginian-Pilot

Published: Sunday, April 20, 2003

9:30 p.m. CDT

It appears a Danbury, Connecticut-based company called Herobuilders has issued a series of action figures based on Iraqi war personalities.

This is the same guy who sells an action figure of Osama bin Laden. In a pink dress.

His most recent produce is a replica of the Iraqi Information Minister - AP says it's Mohammed Saeed al-Sahhaf, but darned if I can remember his
name - that reportedly comes in "dumb" and "dumber" versions.

The "dumber" one talks. Get it?

Tasteless, perhaps. But I'll bet it's a big seller. Apparently the owner, Emil Vicale, receives so much hate e-mail that he actually posts it on his web site.

Here's the original AP story.

A really interesting piece by Elisabeth Bumiller in the Sunday New York Times took a closer look at the way some say the administration successfully "spun" news and events of the war.

(Registration required)

I was fascinated with this bit:

Many critics say the most blatant use of loaded language was the term "coalition forces," repeated on television and in the pages of newspapers, including this one, to describe what was principally a coalition of only two armies, from the United States and Britain, with help from small numbers of Scud-hunting Australian commandos in western Iraq and Polish troops assisting Navy Seals in the south.

I agree with that one very much. As I was building my daily
map/highlight boxes, I tried hard to not use the term "coalition forces"
because it sort of seemed odd to me. I preferred more precise terms like
"U.S. troops," "British Marines" and so on.

It's fair to note, however, that the U.S. forces did, in fact, work in
the south with - as Bumiller says - British and Australian troops and in
the north with Kurdish forces.

Still, that may be a good lesson to remember for next time.

 

charles.apple@pilotonline.com

Charles Apple, Graphics Director at The Virginian-Pilot is also an API discussion leader. Send e-mail to Apple

Email storyPrint this article